BBC World interview re UK spy accountability

Here’s a recent inter­view I did for BBC World about the three top Brit­ish spies deign­ing, for the first time ever, to be pub­licly ques­tioned by the Intel­li­gence and Secur­ity Com­mit­tee in par­lia­ment, which has a notion­al over­sight role:

BBC World inter­view on UK Par­laiment­ary hear­ings on NSA/Snowden affair from Annie Machon on Vimeo.

It sub­sequently emerged that they only agreed to appear if they were told the ques­tions in advance.  So much for this already incred­ibly lim­ited over­sight cap­ab­il­ity in a notion­al West­ern demo­cracy.….

RT interview about the recent Iran nuclear deal

Here’s a recent inter­view I did about the recent Iran nuc­le­ar deal, adding some con­text and his­tory and try­ing to cut through some of today’s media myths:

Rus­sia Today inter­view in Iran nuc­le­ar deal from Annie Machon on Vimeo.

Cryptofestival, London, 30th November

Big_Brother_posterHere’s one for the diary, if you’re in the UK and value your basic, enshrined right to pri­vacy (UDHR Art­icle 12) in this NSA/GCHQ etc dystop­ic, pan­op­tic­an world.

Come along to the Cryptofest­iv­al at Gold­smiths, Lon­don on 30th Novem­ber, where con­cerned hackt­iv­ists can help con­cerned cit­izens learn how to pro­tect their online pri­vacy.

And if you believe the “done noth­ing wrong, noth­ing to hide” garbage, have a look at this.

Crypto­parties, where geeks offer their help for free to their com­munit­ies, were star­ted by pri­vacy advoc­ate Ash­er Wolf in Aus­tralia just over a year  ago.  The phe­nomen­on has swept across the world since then, helped along by the dis­clos­ures of the hero­ic Edward Snowden.

I hope to see you there. You have to fight for your right (crypto)party — and for your right to pri­vacy! Use it or lose it — and bring your laptop.

The German BND does the bidding of USA spies

An inter­view on the Ger­man main­stream TV chan­nel ARD.  The pro­gramme is called FAKT Magazin:

BND will bei Spi­on­age mit­mis­chen from Annie Machon on Vimeo.

Channel 4 interview re UK spy accountability

On the day the UK spy chiefs were called to account for the first time by the Intel­li­gence and Secur­ity Com­mit­tee in the Brit­ish par­lia­ment:

Spy account­ab­il­ity and the ISC — Chan­nel 4 News from Annie Machon on Vimeo.

The spies are called to account

First pub­lished on RT Op-Edge.

As the Snowden-related dis­clos­ures con­tin­ue to flow, each new one refut­ing the last dis­sem­bling state­ments of the des­per­ate spies, dip­lo­mats around the world must be curs­ing the over­ween­ing ambi­tions of the NSA and it vas­sals.

Amer­ic­an ambas­sad­ors are being summoned from their for­ti­fied embassies to account for US mal­feas­ance in coun­try after coun­try: Brazil, Spain, France and, of course, Ger­many.

In this last coun­try there has been scan­dal after scan­dal: first the hoover­ing up of bil­lions of private com­mu­nic­a­tions; the rev­el­a­tion that the Ger­man intel­li­gence agency, the BND, had been an enthu­si­ast­ic part­ner of the NSA in devel­op­ing the XKey­Score pro­gramme and more; then, des­pite this, humi­li­at­ingly to learn that Ger­many is only con­sidered a 3rd Party intel­li­gence part­ner by the Yanks — put­ting them on a par with coun­tries like Iran, China and Rus­sia.

The pièces de résist­ance, how­ever, are the two most recent dis­clos­ures: that Angela Merkal’s private phone had been tar­geted, and that there was a NSA spy base embed­ded in the US embassy in Ber­lin.  This, reportedly, has now ceased oper­a­tions as the US gov­ern­ment tries to appease an incan­des­cent Angela.

Now it is the turn of the Brits, whose ambas­sad­or, Simon McDon­ald, was also this week giv­en a car­pet­ing by the Ger­man For­eign Min­is­ter — for doing pre­cisely what the Amer­ic­ans did and hid­ing a GCHQ spy out­post at the Brit­ish embassy in Ber­lin, flout­ing all kinds of treat­ies and dip­lo­mat­ic pro­to­cols in the pro­cess.  As the embassy was only built in the early 1990s after Ger­man reuni­fic­a­tion, they can­not even claim that this is merely a hangover from the bad old days of the Cold War.

Of course, the Ger­mans are par­tic­u­larly sens­it­ive to encroach­ing sur­veil­lance states, after exper­i­en­cing the hor­rors of the Gestapo and the Stasi. How much more con­cerned need they be, when faced with the sheer scale of the mod­ern tech­no­lo­gic­al cap­ab­il­ity?

Even before the Snowden story broke, Ger­man courts were uphold­ing the con­sti­tu­tion in the face of gov­ern­ment moves to expand the intel­li­gence cap­ab­il­ity to fight the “war on ter­ror”.  Indeed, even some mega-cor­por­a­tions took a stand. In 2009, on the anniversary of the fall of the Ber­lin Wall, the head of T Mobile in Ger­man refused to store the com­mu­nic­a­tions data of ordin­ary Ger­mans, on the off-chance that one or two of them might sub­sequently turn ter­ror­ist — the good of the many out­weighted the threat from a few.

So the Brits are some­what out of favour with the rest of Europe, and espe­cially Ger­many. It was clear, with the rev­el­a­tions about GCHQ’s Tem­pora pro­gramme and the huge fund­ing acquired from the NSA, that GCHQ was no longer primar­ily con­cerned with pro­tect­ing Brit­ish nation­al secur­ity, but had become the European off­shoot of the NSA.  Indeed, intern­al doc­u­ments have shown a man­age­ment obses­sion with pleas­ing their Amer­ic­an pay­mas­ters.

This is the very heart of the so-called spe­cial rela­tion­ship — the com­bined cap­ab­il­it­ies of the NSA and GCHQ.  Even as the old Brit­ish Empire crumbled in the mid-20th cen­tury, the spooks could still build out­posts for eaves­drop­ping in hot­spots around the world: Cyprus, the Middle East, Hong Kong and, er, Ber­lin.  They were happy to offer up the product to their new Amer­ic­an over­lords, as this gave them a con­tinu­ing place at the inter­na­tion­al top table.

This the Brit­ish would find very dif­fi­cult to relin­quish. And this is why, in stark con­trast to all oth­er European coun­tries, the politi­cians have moved to defend the spies, why the mono­chrome phrase “we nev­er dis­cuss intel­li­gence mat­ters” is now wear­ily rolled out on a daily basis, and why intel­li­gence lack­eys across the nation­al media have defen­ded the status quo and respect the vol­un­tary DA Notice gag­ging order.  This is also why the Guard­i­an’s hard drives had to be sym­bol­ic­ally smashed up and why there have been calls to pro­sec­ute the news­pa­per under the dra­coni­an Offi­cial Secrets Act.

It is not the Guard­i­an that has dam­aged Brit­ish nation­al secur­ity (a leg­ally neb­u­lous concept) by print­ing the truth about our spy agen­cies work­ing for the NSA and tramp­ling over our basic rights and freedoms. It is the spies them­selves that have caused the harm, by run­ning amok with leg­ally dubi­ous sur­veil­lance schemes, kid­nap­ping sus­pects around the world, and get­ting involved in tor­ture.

So tomor­row is poten­tially an his­tor­ic date in the annals of Brit­ish intel­li­gence. For the very first time in their 100 year his­tory, the heads of MI5, MI6, and GCHQ will be called to account by the Intel­li­gence and Secur­ity Com­mit­tee in par­lia­ment.  Not only that, the event will be live streamed so we plebs can hear what is being done secretly in our names.

Well, almost live streamed — appar­ently there will be a few seconds delay, in order to ensure no “dam­age to nation­al secur­ity” occurs. My mind is bog­gling some­what at the pos­sib­il­ity that three spooks who have made it to the top of their respect­ive organ­isa­tions would be so inept as to blurt out state secrets on live TV, but you nev­er know…

So, can we hope for a full and frank dis­cus­sion around the Snowden dis­clos­ures? Well, prob­ably not. I have writ­ten at length before about the cosy estab­lish­ment ineptitude of the Prime Minister’s hand-picked stooges who pop­u­late the ISC. Plus the chair­man, Sir Mal­colm Rif­kind (him­self a former For­eign Sec­ret­ary notion­ally in charge of MI6 and GHHQ), has not only pub­licly sup­por­ted the work of GCHQ, post-Snowden, but has also ruled out any dis­cus­sion of “tech­no­lo­gic­al cap­ab­il­it­ies” at the hear­ing.

I hope to be sur­prised.  After all, even the US — the home of the NSA and cause of all this pain — is hold­ing con­gres­sion­al hear­ings and hav­ing nation­al debates. But I fear the good old Brit­ish estab­lish­ment will yet again rally around and pro­tect its own.

White­wash all round!

BBC World Service interview about NSA and spy oversight

Here’s an inter­view I did for BBC World Ser­vice radio about the NSA’a glob­al elec­tron­ic sur­veil­lance and spy over­sight: